1. Dorothy’s baptism was recorded in the records of the Church of England kept in the parish of St. Alphage, Canterbury, Kent [SAC]. The "double date" makes use of a slash to remind us that the month was counted in the ecclesiastical calendar as coming in the last part of the year, whereas according to the civil calendar the month was in the beginning of the ensuing year. Her parents had been married in 1626 [CML]. Scull [GDS] has perpetuated a misidentification of her baptism as one in Godmersham in 1611 [SLG]. This incorrect identification has more recently been perpetuated by none other than the highly reputable Oxford Dictionary of National Biography [SCH]. Demographic considerations and the preponderance of evidence make the Dorothy of 1611 an aunt who would have been the child buried in 1614 [SAC]. The earliest published misidentification of Dorothy seems to have been in 1876 [JRS]. This book also calls her husband “Samuel Gotherson” instead of “Daniel.” Judge Davis’ recollection was that her age at death on April 10, 1688 was 58.2.8. This brings with it its own difficulties. It is possible to interpret “59^th” as meaning 59 rather than 58 years. This supposition allows us to stretch her calculated birth to February 2, 1629 [cf. fn. 52, SJD p. 11]. We conclude that the judge was off by at least three days (“8” for “11”), and possibly by a week (“8” for “18”?).